May 3, 2015:
All the News that’s Fit to Print: World Free Press
Day at All Souls Unitarian Universalist of Putnam County
A few months back my sister—she and her family live in Mexico
City—wrote to me that her eldest son—my nephew Scott—had found a picture on
line—a picture of our father from the night our brother Scott died in a fire.
That night, on the heels of the gentle and good police officer—who’d taken my
Dad to identify the body and poured whiskey on their return—three “reporters”
knocked on the door. They said they could help with the “investigation.” They
had us looking for photographs, and asked questions—the answers to which no
longer mattered.
The next day, they published a photograph taken at “the
scene,” Dad standing in the dark with smoke still floating up from the fire
that had consumed his only son.
That’s the photo my nephew found, and I’m pretty I’m the one
who posted it—along with a rant about heartless journalism.
Often, too often, I dip my broad brush into that night—and
judge the free press by it. I forget that Walter Cronkite essentially ended our
role in the Viet Nam war—with words. With words, and images, the free press ignited the battle against
Chicago’s cruel slaughter houses and continues to question our human role in
this interdependent web of all existence, of which we are a part.
Journalists still risk their lives every day—to bring us, all
of us, the truth.
Then there’s Fox News. I gave up television years ago, and
had only heard about Fox News. I’ll be honest…I thought it was the on-air
version of the Enquirer. I didn’t think
anyone took it seriously until a visit to Gainesville’s after-hours clinic.
While I was filling out the paperwork, Glen Beck was spouting off on the
office’s television. When I turned in my forms, I sheepishly told the
administrative person at the desk—“By the way, you have Fox News on.” Rather than leaping up in horror and changing the
channel, the young woman leveled her eyes into mine and said “I suppose you’d
like to have CNN on.”
I sat down and tried not to look or listen but like a train
wreck, I couldn’t turn away—ending up exchanging horrified but silent glances
with a young Southeast Asian man who was waiting with his wife.
In 1897, New York Times owner Adolph S. Ochs coined the
phrase: “All the News That’s Fit to Print,” in essence covenanting with the
reading public to report the news impartially. In 2015 the phrase “All the News
That’s Fit to Sell” resonates.
Still May third is the day we celebrate the "fundamental
principles of press freedom—to evaluate press freedom around the world, to
defend the media from attacks on their independence and to pay tribute to
journalists who have lost their lives in the exercise of their profession.”
Around the world we find journalists sentenced to ridiculous
prison terms and murdered—for telling the truth—for proclaiming the truth. Words…and
images.
In February 1968, Walter Cronkite closed saying:
“…it is increasingly clear to this reporter that the only
rational way out then will be to negotiate, not as victors, but as an honorable
people who lived up to their pledge to defend democracy, and did the best they
could.
This is Walter Cronkite. Good night.”
Overnight war became a dirty word.
The soldier was no longer a buttoned-up portrait but a
multi-dimensional character in a nation’s morality play.
The power…the beauty…of a free press is that it holds a
mirror up and says “Look!” We see the good, the bad…and the ugly.
One could argue that Cronkite broke the impartiality
covenant. But I believe he was being honest—it wasn’t about ratings.
Today we might still be in Viet Nam, as we are in Afghanistan
and Iraq.
A friend and fine journalist, Jeff Klinkenberg, reminded me
of the words of Eugene “Gene” Patterson:
“At its simplest, a free press keeps people free.
No society can stay free if its rulers go unwatched. For
power corrupts. Given secrecy, people with power can do as they please, and
seize yet more power until they crush any who differ.
A free press stands vigil on their acts and tells the public
what they’re up to.
So the public can identify the rascals and, with the free
vote, turn them out.
Blind the people to scrutiny of its leaders and they will
saddle it with tyranny as surely as history foretells the future.
Every authoritarian regime that has oppressed a people has
first hushed its free press.
No people informed by a free press will long accept
oppression.
Remember this always when foolish citizens grow impatient
with imperfections of a free press. Their chance to stay free rests on its
right to be wrong.”
I get most of my news online, although NPR is usually playing
in the background. And although a transplant, I’m a true Floridaphile baptized
in swamp cathedrals and driven past the edge of sanity by no-seeums.
Until quite recently I fed my currently indoors-too-much self
by reading Jeff Klinkenberg’s Florida tales published in the Tampa Bay Times. I didn’t subscribe. He
posted the stories to his facebook page. I think I still have one or two saved
to read later.
Then he announced his unexpectedly early retirement.
What is it now?
Three or four corporations own all of our media outlets?
When I spoke with Jeff the other day, he said the current
trend had him in fear for our democracy.
I’m scared too.
The power of the press is indisputable.
In 1950, J. “Ding” Darling drew a cartoon—two tiny key deer
pursued by huge dogs and hunters. Although I’ve heard them described as
six-pointers that fit in your cooler, no one hunts for key deer anymore.
Given today’s social media, there’s a chance that that cartoon
could—for better or worse—end hunting altogether.
When the press gets it wrong, things can get very wrong. On the
way over this morning I was listening to the Bob Edwards show memorializing May 4—the
shooting at Kent State. Turns out because a local news outlet assumed a
Guardsman had been shot, they announced it, and rumors of student snipers went
rampant. Even after the truth had been revealed, because of that first
impression, more than half the public believed the students were responsible
for their fates.
Have you thought about the power you wield with your mouse?
Has social media replaced the free press? From Arab Spring to
Ferguson and now Baltimore, social media—facebook, twitter, Instagram—is the
fuel that feeds the flame of truth…and untruth. Have you seen the stuff the creationists
post? Or the tea party? Or the White House? The Unitarian Universalist
Association? All Souls?
Who’s going to tell us what’s true and what’s false?
I remember watching an interview with Connie Chung. She said
that the initiation for young reporters was to show up at the cemetery on the
anniversary of President Kennedy’s death in the hope of “running into” Rose
Kennedy. I thought that a macabre ritual.
But you know what? I would have read that story.
In 2014, sixty one journalists were killed, and I don’t think
we have a handle on how many are imprisoned or otherwise captive. Men and
women, reporters, photographers, cartoonists, publishers risk their freedom and
their lives to tell the truth…in words and images.
With the exception of interacting with some of Florida’s more
colorful flora and fauna, my friend Jeff Klinkenberg wasn’t risking his
life—but he was telling the truth about Florida to a public that thinks of
Florida as Disney World, condos, and spring breakers. He chalks most of what’s
going on to brutal economics. I shared at least a dozen of Jeff’s stories with
my facebook friends. I wish I’d subscribed—I wish my friends had too.
Reporters and photographers for local and national newspapers
are being cut. And I know they’ve all cut the editorial staff—I can hardly read
some articles for the typos.
Have you thought about the power you wield with your mouse?
With your dollars?
Sure Faux News gets it wrong most of the time, but when CNN
is almost as bad—it’s time to speak up.
“At its simplest, a free press keeps people free.”
In 2013, the Chicago
Sun Times laid off all its fulltime photographers. They published the
photograph of my father. I still have it. My father must have cut it out of the
paper and saved it. For forty-four years I’ve been so angry with the three men
who came to our home after being at “the scene.” How could someone snap a photo
of a man’s heart breaking?
I took the now-fragile newspaper clipping out again this morning, after
reading the sixty-one names of journalists killed last year. Forty four
years—and I saw it today for the first time.
I wonder.
I wonder how many fathers held their sons just a little bit
closer, talked to their daughters a little while longer, and held their
spouse’s hand a bit tighter.
I wonder.